I love word derivation, especially the fabricated kind. Erotica comes from the Greek “Eros”, the God of Love. Porn comes from the Greek “Prone”, the largest chariot parts distributor in Athens. The former is about hearts and the latter about parts. This is the difference between women and men, hearts versus parts. Think about it. What happens the first time things start to heat up between a man and a woman? All the courting stuff is completed. It worked. There is mutual interest, and there is opportunity. The woman is all about violins, candle light, romance, long soft stares, hours of caressing–you know mushy heart stuff. Meanwhile, all the guy has on his mind is: “hope my part is big enough”, “hope my part doesn’t explode prematurely”, “hope my part works long enough”, “hope she helps me find her part”, “hope I don’t go in the wrong part”, “hope she has part protection”, “hope she gets those violinists out of here”–you know, chariot parts distribution stuff. Men like things to be simple, to the point. It is a good match for their smaller, uncluttered brains. Hell, men can’t even take the time to call it pornography. It takes too long. It’s a mouthful, so to speak. So men call it porn. It’s a nice word, four letters, fits their predisposition for single syllable words. Women, on the other hand, like things to take time. They like words that sound romantic, that sound Italian. For instance, the original word for erotica was actually “ergot”. Yeah, really. A guy named Benny came up with that. But women didn’t like the short, abrupt, harsh sound. So they smoothed it out like a gentle jazz riff and called it “erotica”. It takes a lot longer to say. It sounds Italian too. I know. It all seems so … so sexist. I suppose it is, but what can I tell you. Men like parts. Men like putting this part with that part. Who’s the one that spends most of Christmas Eve putting bicycles and wagons together? It’s the guy. Raise your hand if you are a female auto mechanic, that is, a heterosexual female auto mechanic (not that there is anything wrong with any other kind). Aha! Raise your hand if you know a female auto mechanic. As I thought, none! Men like parts because parts don’t talk about their feelings, besides they usually come with cool diagrams and instructions! Men love instructions as long as they don’t have to hear them. When they hear instructions, they sound more like directions, which remind men of their mothers. For the most part, men don’t like to be reminded of their mothers.

So men prefer to read their instructions. Men would love women a lot more if women came with diagrams and instructions that men could read and study up on. That would be very helpful. [A question: should men come with instructions? My inclination is that it is unnecessary, but if they did, they would be short, maybe a sentence or two, similar to instructions that might come with a cereal bowl. I'd like to hear from women on this.] Anyway, because of this difference (i.e., hearts versus parts), men and women are best served if they refrain from actually building things promotional pens together. The closest my parents came to divorce was not from rearing four boys. It was from working on a stained glass, lampshade kit together. Within four hours dad was threatening to solder mom’s mouth shut while she held a piece of pink glass acne treatment to his throat. It was ugly. Once, I tried to put a grill together with a woman. She thought it would be a nice way to bond. I had my doubts. I was right. It didn’t go so well. First, she insisted on saying we debt recovery were “making a grill together”. Women love to make things. They make cookies. They make beds. They make babies. They even make themselves up. Oh yeah, and they make love. Guys don’t make love; they have sex, which is a short for putting part together Debt Help as efficiently as possible. Guys put things together. Guys don’t make a grill; they put a grill together, part by part. But I didn’t have the energy to argue the point.

So I let her believe we were “making a grill together”. Next, she started in on the instructions, asking “why” drug rehab to every sentence. I kept telling her, “um … because it’s um … an instruction?” I sensed her growing frustration with the same answer I gave to the repeated inquiries. Finally, after we completed the Whey Protein first page–we had twenty-two more to go–she wanted to stop and take a moment or two for me to share my feelings with her about our first page experience. I answered, “I’m filled with guarded congeniality”. She soon left to “make” a phone call–I think it was for Theatre Los Angeles a taxi, if I remember correctly. When I started this little piece, I wasn’t sure where it was going to lead me. Now that I know, I think I’ll stop here before really say something I’ll regret, although I sense it may be way too late. Yeah, I’m looking at the size of Acting Classes the hole I just dug and it’s pretty damn big–big enough to fit me and that stupid grill I “put together”. Well, let me just jump in now. There are plenty of shovels to go around. make money online Feel free to start tossing the dirt on top of me, if it will make you feel any better–and I say that with the most sincere, unguarded, congeniality. Close to the Healing Spirituality- A great place and franchising time to be in, Ayurveda and Yoga. Meaning ‘science of life’, Ayurveda needs no introduction. Revered all over the world, Ayurveda, heals one and takes care that aims at restoring health through the use of diet, herbs, way of life advice, purification techniques, and also the luxury oil messages.

Char Dam Yare- The four sacred places Badrinath, Kedarnath, Yamunotri, and Gadgetry are collectively called char dam yare. This is a sacred station for the Hindus. A get away from the scorching heat, this is a trip which helps you with two at a time, vacation at a business training cooler place and religious sentiments. Get Soaked with Gnash- a 10 day festival in Mumbai, this happens towards the end of summers. Called Gnash Chaturthi, it is celebrated throughout India, but the most fun is in no no hair removal Mumbai.

A lot of cultural programs keep happening.

distribution of sweets, and worshiping the popular elephant headed-Gnash. On the 11th day, the idol is immersed in the Arabian Sea after a pompous procession is being carried out in the town. Run with the Chariots- The mid-summer Chariot Festival in Pure, Orissa, pulls a million devotees and visitors every year, they merchant account reviews take part in a massive parade as three huge, alluring wood chariots are pulled from side to side the streets. It’s one of the major festivals in India – so big, it stirred the word “juggernaut.” The word was formed when 19th-century British audience saw people, going nuts with affection, throw iPhone themselves under the massive wheels of the chariot of Lord Jagannath’s. The Grand Snake Boat Race the Oman festival of late August felicitates the hot southern state’s wealthy enriching legacy when the whole thing is new and joyful. On display are a lot of games and sports, conventional art forms, drama, and classical paleo diet music all in ten days festival. Nehru Trophy Snake Boat Race, is the biggest snake boat race in the world, it is the main attraction of the event. A shopping festival is also organized bedroom vanity with it. Relish Mangoes- Before the monsoon reaches, the heat is killing in India. The only relief and the only reason why people bear such heat are -the mangoes, the king of fruits. Mangoes are everywhere in the news these times, because of the celebration of the fruit. Almost all diy repair the five stars and almost every place organize a mango festival. Celebrate Krishna’s Birthday- Janamashtami Krishna is one of Hinduism’s very significant and much-loved gods. He can be depicted as a divine baby, flute-playing young man, free ipod and dedicated lover – at the side of his companion Radar – or as Aruba’s charioteer all through the epic fight of the Mahabharata. Stirring keen loyalty among his supporters, his mid-summer birthday is called kent wedding photographer Janamashtami. This is a festival which is cherished all across the nation, but it is best celebrated in his birthplace, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. In the late sixteenth century, four separate editions of the Nostradamus prophecies were published in the city of Paris, salsa classes london each of which contained major textual alterations from all other editions: thirty-nine prophetic stanzas were entirely deleted and replaced with other stanzas. Mortem St. George, author of Incantation of the Law against Inept Critics: A Guide to Cryptic Thinking, made a discovery. He discovered that the numerical sequences acne treatment of consecutive deletions corresponded exactly to numerical sequences found in a book called the Safer Yetzirah, the earliest known text of the medieval Kabala. That was only the beginning. St. George’s next discovery was that many sections of another classical text of the Kabala, known as the Bahia or Safer ha-Bahia, were essentially a cryptic derivative (riddles and parables evidently designed to teach in the style of the masters of Zen) of prophecies published by Nostradamus centuries later. It became self-evident that hair extensions some of the famous prophecies were known in medieval times and hence predate Nostradamus. The ancient prophecies had a name: the Revelations of Elijah. Combining a passage from Sadie Gain’s Commentary on the Safer Yetzirah with information from other sources, St. George has concluded that the cabalists believed that a chariot Smokeless Cigarettes descended from the sky and delivered both the Safer Yetzirah and the Revelations of Elijah to Talmudic scholars, in a Babylonian desert, in the late sixth century. That would mark when and where the Kabala originated. Copies of the Safer Yetzirah were eventually scattered around the globe. The reverse phone lookup Revelations of Elijah, however, according to St. George, were never copied because this book glowed in the dark (and continued to do so for centuries), causing the cabalists to believe that it contained the divine essence. A few centuries later, lift kit the Babylonian cabalists migrated to Europe. St. George found indications that the group carrying the Revelations of Elijah went to Germany, and then settled in Provence, Nostradamus’ homeland. The story does not end there. In subsequent investigations, St. George stumbled upon signs in job shop software the writings of Khayyam Vital and elsewhere that Isaac Luria, founder of the Loraine Kabala, went to Provence to study the Kabala under Nostradamus, and that Luria may have assisted in writing the stanzas that mask the revelations. NY Rentals St. George suspects that Luria’s gateway to Nostradamus was Nostradamus’ brother, a grain dealer who made frequent trips to Egypt, and that accounts of Luria having spent seven years living as a hermit were merely a fabrication Rancho Santa Fe Homes For Sale to cover up his disappearance from Egypt. Contact with the Revelations of Elijah, according to St. George, would explain how Luria, still too young by tradition to be even taught the Kabala, was able to impact the cabalistic community in the Holy Land. St. George La Jolla homes for sale feels that Nostradamus may have been too preoccupied with the future of humankind to have spent much time developing cabalistic theory. Consequently, the Kabala that he taught Luria, and which Luria took to the Holy Land, was likely developed within secret circles in earlier times. Carmel Valley real estate According to St. George, significant elements of the Loraine Kabala can be seen as a product of reflections upon the Book of Light, otherwise known as the Revelations of Elijah. St. George considers the Revelations of Elijah to be the greatest, longest-lasting, and best-kept secret in human history, san diego short sale maintained and yet unbroken for a thousand years. He also thinks it foolish to believe that a concealed book cannot influence the course of history, but he declines to go into details on that theme. St. san diego homes for sale George also declines to explain why Nostradamus decided to destroy the Revelations of Elijah, but he insists that to the very end the Provencal cabalists never disclosed their possession of that book; their only mistake chicago real estate was publishing revelations that they could not understand.

Incantation of the Law against Inept Critics.

A Guide to Cryptic Thinking is not a book about the Kabala. The word Kabala makes no appearance in its text. St. George’s book does, however, fully reproduce the Paris alterations in relevant context and, in unrelated context but nonetheless useful, it Car Buying also exhibits the revelations that form the subject matter of the Bahia riddles. Kabala Notes the following are additional notes from my first interview with Mortem St. George on the Kabala theme. For their technical nature, they were left out of an earlier, limited distribution of “Nostradamus Linked to the Kabala.” how to get rid of man boobs However, I now see that they provide useful information, so I am appending them to the full distribution of this article. I) St. George theorizes that the chariot originally delivered a total of one hundred revelations. He further surmises that, following indications in Ideal Weight Calculator the first sentence of co-delivered book Safer Yetzirah, the early cabalists isolated thirty two of those revelations and designated them as “paths of wisdom.” In the Paris edition modifications, exactly thirty-two stanzas follow the same pattern of verse re-ordering. Thus, out of the original one hundred Revelations of Elijah, St. George believes that Nostradamus cheap jerseys published the thirty-two paths of wisdom plus an additional ten revelations. ii) St. George is convinced that the purpose of the Paris alterations was to provide a scheme for locating the real revelations within video games Nostradamus’ book. However, out of the thirty-nine Paris alterations, St. George claims that only the first replacement and the last replacement correspond to a real revelation. Consequently, to locate the remaining revelations, St. George believes buy dvd one must learn how to steer a course to them, possibly via manoeuvres around or through circles or spheres. To date, St. George has not been successful in doing this. iii) All four of the Paris editions of the late sixteenth baby stores century are still extant and all four are available in public libraries. Two of them can be found in the Library of the British Museum, in London, and their textual variants were personally recorded by St. George. The other two are in libraries marketing strategy in France. A bibliographic report on the variants in France did not mention the first modification, the one and only modification in Nostradamus’ second group of one hundred stanzas, and St. George does not know if that was an seo packages oversight on part of the bibliographer or if there are slight differences beyond the three additional stanzas of the French versions. iv) Diverse, brief descriptions of the Thirty-Two Paths of Wisdom are still extant, each constituting a synopsis of the essence of a Nostradamus stanza. St. car dvd players George says it is “fun and games” linking up the descriptions with their corresponding revelations. He also told me that some of the best English-language descriptions of the paths are to be found in books written by Christian investigators of the Kabala. v) For people wishing to learn about the Kabala, St. George recommends Gresham Scholar’s Origins of the Kabala to become quickly familiar with the theme. This book includes rare references to the Revelations of Elijah. St. George says to read carefully, looking for tie-ins with the revelations. For example, when Schooled argan oil notes that medieval cabalists appended “the surname of the prophet” to their name, you need only look to the first verse of revelation II-28 for an explanation; there you will find “the surname of the prophet.” Look, in particular, for instances where Schooled expresses surprise or shock, payday loans online such as when he notes with exclamation point that the Bahia refers to the Moon goddess. Indeed, the Moon goddess is unlikely to have played a role in Judaism in any epoch, but for an explanation you need only drop down one verse in II-28, affiliate marketing where you will find Diana, the Moon goddess! vi) St. George recalls that the first sign he encountered of a connection between Nostradamus and Isaac Luria came from a passage in Khayyam Vitals’ Safer ha-Hezyonot, which conveys packaging a date in 1566 on the Jewish calendar. In this passage, someone is unable to stop grieving and weeping. The Jewish date converts to the date of Nostradamus’ death. However, St. George does not believe that the Loraine Kabala would be particularly singapore sales helpful for manoeuvring around the spheres. vii) One hundred and two years after the death of Nostradamus, a Dutch printer by the name of Jean Janssen published an original manuscript of Nostradamus’ Epistle, the first publication ever of this manuscript. St. George knows that it was an original manuscript because it contained textual variants that only Nostradamus himself could have created. The same Dutch printer also published, in Hebrew and Latin, the book of creation Safer Yetzirah, to which he appended a description of the thirty-two deal of the day paths of wisdom. The description of the twenty-eighth path, however, was omitted. Consequently, St. George believes there is a chance that Nostradamus’ book may contain only thirty-one of the thirty-two paths. According to St. George, the missing path would have been a dated revelation concerning the landlords insurance death of Nostradamus’ king, Henry II of France, which for certain reasons, Nostradamus could not publish and may have replaced with another revelation. Britain may no longer rule the waves, but the

British Gold Britannia makes a great addition to any gold bullion coin

collection. Just like the gold coins issued by Canada, the Gold Maple, the Australian nugget and the US gold Eagle & gold Buffalo, it is available in a variety caravan insurance of sizes ranging from 1 ounce down to tenth of ounces. The coin was first minted in 1987 to take advantage of the popularity of the Kruger and (whose effective distribution was limited by sanctions imposed on the apartheid regime). Seeing a gap in the market, the seo services london UK issued the first Gold Britannia coin. Even though it was always intended as a bullion coin, it is minted in 22Kt (917- 91.7% Gold). Like similar bullion coins, it is “overweight”, so you always get your one free iphone ounce of pure gold. Interestingly, the coin has a face value of 100 pounds sterling. Compare that with the $50 for the one ounce US gold eagle coin…… The premium on these coins can be a little high for bunk beds for kids my taste, as they are not always readily available. I recommend that if you decide that you want one, it pays to tell your gold bullion dealer to give you a call next time he has a batch in, rather than bidding up an inflated price. Unlike the Kruger and graduate courses for teachers silver Britannia bullion coin is also available. I always have to stress to people that “Silver Kruger ands” do not really exist. These are mere fantasy coins and have no connection with the official mint. Silver Britannia bullion coins are real and very attractive- although again, they seem to command camden town a high premium. One of the best features of this coin is that they regularly change the design. There are versions with Britannia seated, Britannia driving a chariot etc. This makes for some interesting variety. One adult friend finder review criticism I’d make, is that some of the designs seem a little cluttered – a bit like the Austrian gold Philharmonic coin. Excerpts from “The Lord of the Wrinkles” from Part One: The Fool ship of the Ring spread betting “So, Sour man, old buddy, old pal,” Handoff said. “How’s it hanging?” The evil white wizard frowned. “Do not beat around the bush, Handoff Gravy beard. Let us cut to the chase. I know why you have come.” Handoff whistled, feigning innocence as he inspected the gloomy living room of Sour man’s tower, Icing Lard. “This place could use a facelift,” he said. “I can recommend a great fang shun consultant.” “I have a better idea,” Sour man said. “Join with us. Join the forces of evil that have allied themselves with Sarong. web hosting His is the lidless eye that never sleeps.” “Hmmm, insomnia, yes. No wonder he’s so cranky all the time.” Handoff backed away from Sour man, whistling. “Not so fast, Handoff.” Sour man pressed the panic button on his security system. All four chamber doors slammed shut and a pantry cupboard flew open, revealing runescape gold a week’s worth of bottled water and canned goods. “Put up your dukes, Handoff!” Sour man held out his staff and flipped Handoff upside down in midair. Pennies rained from Handoff’s pockets. Sour man pointed his staff at the hot penny stocks ceiling, and Handoff rose higher, grey robe billowing down around his face, revealing spindly legs and a pair of boxer shorts with “Thursday” printed all over them. Sour man advanced toward Handoff. “You dare to oppose Sarong,” he snarled. “Now halloween costumes you will know what it is to feel pain.” “Actually,” said Handoff, his voice muffled by the robe, “I already know how pain feels, so we could skip this part and save ourselves some time.” “No,” Sour man said. barbados holidays “Let’s not and say we did.” Let’s look at a quote from from Bossuet [tutor to the Dauphin in the Court of Louis XIV]:* “One of the things most strongly impressed (by whom?) Upon the minds provillus of the Egyptians was patriotism…. No one was permitted to be useless to the state. The law gave everyone a job which was passed down from father to son. No one could have two jobs. And no one was pop up stands allowed to change jobs either…. But there was one job everyone had to do: study laws and wisdom. There was no excuse for ignorance of religion or the country’s political system. Moreover, every job was assigned (by whom?) bamboo sheets to a certain district…. Among the good laws, one of the best was that everyone was trained (by whom?) to obey them. Consequently, Egypt was filled with wonderful inventions, and nothing was neglected that could make life easy and quiet” *Translator’s note: The parenthetical expressions and the italicized words how to lose belly fat throughout this book were supplied by Mr. Bastia. All subheads and bracketed material were supplied by the translator. So according to Bossuet, man doesn’t make anything for himself. Patriotism, prosperity, inventions, husbandry, and science — web hosting australia all of these were granted to people by the almighty state. All people need to do is bow. A Defence of Paternal Government Bossuet takes this idea that the state is the origin of progress so far as to defend the Egyptians against the accusation that they rejected wrestling and music. stationery supplies He said: “How is that possible? These arts were invented by Trismegistus [who was alleged to have been Chancellor to the Egyptian god Osiris]“. And again among the Persians, Bossuet claims that all comes from above: “One of the prince’s first responsibilities was to home loans promote agriculture….There were offices founded for the purpose of regulating the army and there were offices for regulating farm work….The Persians had an overwhelming respect for royal authority.” Bossuet also said that even though the Greeks were brilliant they had no concept of personal responsibility; like dogs and cloud computing companies horses, they couldn’t have even invented a simple game: “The Greeks, naturally intelligent and courageous, had been early cultivated by the kings and settlers who had come from Egypt. From these Egyptian rulers, the Greeks learned bodily exercises, foot races, and horse and chariot races…. But virtual tours the best thing that they learned was to be submissive and allow them to be melded by the law for the good of society.” The Idea of Passive Mankind You can’t dispute that these dbc network classical theories [advanced by these latter-day teachers, writers, legislators, economists, and philosophers] believed that everything was given to man by some source outside themselves. For example, take Fenelon [archbishop, author, and instructor to the Duke of Burgundy]. He witnessed the power of Louis XIV. This, and the home loans fact that he was taught in classical theories and the admiration of antiquity, naturally led Fenelon to believe that mankind was passive; that man’s misfortunes and prosperity — vices and virtues — are because life insurance quotes of the external influence exerted on them by the law and lawmakers. And so in his Utopia of Selenium, he puts man, along with all of his interests, faculties, desires and belongings under the absolute rule of the legislator. No matter what the issue is, people don’t make their own decisions; cheap contacts the prince does. The prince is portrayed as the soul of the unorganized mass of people who make up the country. He alone possesses the thoughts, foresight, progress and principles of organization and as a result he alone is responsible for what happens. The entire tenth book of Fenelon’s seitensprung Telemachus proves this. I allude to it and pride myself with quoting it at random from this acclaimed work which, in every other respect, I’m the first to pay it homage. Socialists Ignore Reason and Facts With the amazing best vacuum cleaner credulity which is typical of the classicists, Fenelon completely ignores reason and facts when he says that the happiness of the Egyptians didn’t come from their own wisdom but from their kings: “We couldn’t look at either shore without seeing rich towns and country best self tanner estates most agreeably located; fields, never hardened, covered with golden crops every year; meadows full of flocks; workers bending under the weight of the fruit which the earth lavished upon its cultivators; shepherds who made the echoes forex trading system resound with the soft notes from their pipes and flutes. “Happy,” said Mentor, “is the people governed by a wise king.”…” Later, Mentor asked me to observe the contentment and abundance which saturated Egypt, where twenty-two thousand cities could be counted. He admired the good young drivers insurance police regulations in the cities; the justice rendered in favour of the poor against the rich; the sound education of the children in obedience, labour, sobriety, and the love of the arts and letters; the exactness with personal injury claims which all religious ceremonies were performed; the unselfishness, the high regard for honour, the faithfulness to men, and the fear of the gods which every father taught his children. He never stopped admiring the prosperity chicago flowers of the country. “Happy,” said he, “is the people ruled by a wise king in such a manner.” Socialists Want to Regiment People Fenelon’s idyll on Crete is even more enticing. Mentor says: “All that no no hair removal reviews you see here is because of the laws of Minus. The education which he ordained for the children makes their bodies strong and robust. From the very beginning, one accustoms the children to a life of frugality and labour, because one assumes that all sensual pleasures weaken the mazda phoenix body and the mind. Thus one allows them no pleasure except that of becoming invincible by virtue, and of acquiring glory…. Here one punishes three vices that go unpunished among other people: ingratitude, hypocrisy, and greed. There is no need to punish persons for pomp and dissipation, because they don’t exist in Crete…. No expensive furniture, no magnificent clothing, no delicious feasts, no gilded palaces are permitted.” And so Mentor readies his meld and to manipulate — no doubt with the best intentions — the people of Ithaca. And to convince his student how wise these concepts are, Mentor recites the example of Selenium. It is from this line of thinking that we get our first political ideas! We’re taught to treat people like an agricultural instructor teaches people to prepare and tend soil. A Famous Name and an Evil Idea Now listen to the great Montesquieu on this same subject: “To maintain the spirit of commerce, it is necessary that all the laws must favour it. These laws, by proportionately dividing up the fortunes as they are made in commerce, should provide every poor citizen with sufficiently easy circumstances to enable him to work like the others. These same laws should put every rich citizen in such lowered circumstances as to force him to work in order to keep or to gain.” So the law is supposed to get rid of all fortunes! Even though real equality is the purpose of a democracy, it is so difficult to make that happen that an exact precision wouldn’t always be desirable.

It’s good enough that there is a census to reduce or fix such

differences of wealth within certain guidelines. After that’s done, you still need specific laws to balance the inequality by burdening the rich while helping the poor. Once again we see the concept of forced equality by law. There were two kinds of republics in Greece: Sparta and Athens. Sparta was a military republic while Athens was commercial. In the former, it was ideal for citizens to be idle but in the latter the love of hard work was promoted. Note this legislator’s genius: By debasing all established customs — by mixing the usual concepts of all virtues — they knew in advance that the world would admire their wisdom. Lycurgus gave stability to Sparta by combining petty thievery with the soul of justice; by merging utter bondage with purest liberty; by combining the most horrible beliefs with the utmost moderation. He seemed to deprive the city of all of its resources, arts, commerce, money, and defences. In Sparta, there was no possibility of reward for ambition. There was no outlet for natural affection since a man wasn’t considered son, husband, or father. Chastity wasn’t considered becoming either. It was by this road that Lycurgus led Sparta to greatness and glory. This boldness in the institutions of Greece has been repeated in the midst of the degeneracy and corruption of our modern times. Occasionally an honest legislator has been able to meld a people in whom integrity is as natural as Spartan courage. Mr. William Penn, for example, is a true Lycurgus. Even though Mr. Penn had peace as his objective — while Lycurgus had war as his objective — they’re similar because their moral prestige over free men allowed them to overcome prejudices, to subdue passions, and to lead their people into new paths. The country of Paraguay gives us another example [of a people who, for their own good, are melded by their legislators].* *Translator’s note: What was then known as Paraguay was a much larger area than it is today. It was colonized by the Jesuits who settled the Indians into villages, and generally saved them from further brutalities by the avid conquerors. It’s true that if someone considers the pleasure of commanding as the greatest joy in life, he contemplates a crime against society; however, it will always be a noble goal to lead men in a way that makes them happier. Those who wish to found similar institutions must do the following: Establish common ownership of property as in Plato’s republic; revere the gods as Plato commanded; prevent foreigners from mingling with the people, in order to preserve the customs; only let the state and not the citizens establish commerce. The legislators should supply arts instead of luxuries; they should satisfy needs instead of desires. A Frightful Idea Those inclined to vulgar infatuation may exclaim: “Montesquieu has said this! So it’s magnificent! It’s sublime!” As for me, I’m blessed with the ability to have my own opinion. I say: What! You dare to say that that’s okay? It is frightful! It is abominable! These random selections from the Montesquieu writings show that he considers persons, liberties, property — humanity itself — to be nothing but materials for legislators to exercise their wisdom upon. The Leader of the Democrats Let’s looks at Rousseau on this topic. This writer on public affairs is the supreme authority of the democrats. Even though he bases social structure on the people’s will, he has probably more than anyone completely bought into the idea of the utter inertness of mankind in the presence of the legislators: “If it is true that a great prince is rare, then is it not true that a great legislator is even more rare? The prince has only to follow the pattern that the legislator creates. The legislator is the mechanic who invents the machine; the prince is merely the workman who sets it in motion. And what part do persons play in all this? They are merely the machine that is set in motion. In fact, are they not merely considered to be the raw material of which the machine is made?” And so the same relationship exists between the legislator and prince in the same vein as the agricultural expert and farmer; and the relationship between the prince and his subjects is identical to the farmer and his land. How high above man then has this writer placed himself? Rousseau rules even the legislator and tells them how to do their job in the following terms: “Would you give stability to the state? Then bring the extremes as closely together as possible. Tolerate neither wealthy persons nor beggars. If the soil is poor or barren, or the country too small for its inhabitants, then turn to industry and arts, and trade these products for the foods that you need…. On a fertile soil — if you are short of inhabitants — devote all your attention to agriculture, because this multiplies people; banish the arts, because they only serve to depopulate the nation…. If you have extensive and accessible coast lines, then cover the sea with merchant ships; you will have a brilliant but short existence. If your seas wash only inaccessible cliffs, let the people be barbarous and eat fish; they will live more quietly — perhaps better — and, most certainly, they will live more happily. In short, and in addition to the maxims that are common to all, every people has its own particular circumstances. And this fact in itself will cause legislation appropriate to the circumstances.” This is why originally the Hebrews — and, more recently, the Arabs — had religion as their main objective. The Athenian’s objective was literature; Carthage and Tyre, commerce; Rhodes, naval affairs; Sparta, war; and Rome, virtue. The author of The Spirit of Laws has shown by what are the legislator should direct his institutions toward each of these objectives…. But what if the legislator gets the wrong objective and acts on the wrong principle? What if the selected principle results in slavery and sometimes liberty; sometimes wealth and sometimes population; sometimes peace and other times conquest? Such confusion of objective would cripple the law and constitution. The state would suffer so many problems it would be either destroyed or changed, and invincible nature regains her empire. But if nature is more than invincible enough to regain control, then why doesn’t Rousseau just admit that the legislator was unnecessary in the first place? Why doesn’t he realize that men, by following their instinct, would choose to farm on fertile ground, and to do business on an extensive, easily accessible coast without the interference from someone like Lycurgus, Salon or a Rousseau who could very well make a mistake? Socialists Want Forced Conformity Regardless, Rousseau burdens the creators, organizers, directors, legislators, and rulers of society with an enormous responsibility. As a result he is very exacting with them: “He who would dare to undertake the political creation of a people ought to believe that he can, in a manner of speaking, transform human nature; transform each individual — who, by himself, is a solitary and perfect whole — into a mere part of a greater whole from which the individual will henceforth receive his life and being. Thus the person who would undertake the political creation of a people should believe in his ability to alter man’s constitution; to strengthen it; to substitute for the physical and independent existence received from nature, an existence which is partial and moral.* In short, the would- be creator of political man must remove man’s own forces and endow him with others that are naturally alien to him.” Poor human nature! What would happen to someone’s dignity if it were in the hands of Rousseau’s followers? *Translator’s note: According to Rousseau, the existence of social man is partial in the sense that he is henceforth merely a part of society. Knowing himself as such — and thinking and feeling from the point of view of the whole – he thereby becomes moral. Legislators Desire to Meld Mankind Let’s look at what Renal had to say on the topic of mankind being melded by the legislator: “The legislator must first consider the climate, the air, and the soil. The resources at his disposal determine his duties. He must first consider his locality. A population living on maritime shores must have laws designed for navigation…. If it is an inland settlement, the legislator must make his plans according to the nature and fertility of the soil…. It is especially in the distribution of property that the genius of the legislator will be found. As a general rule, when a new colony is established in any country, sufficient land should be given to each man to support his family…. On an uncultivated island that you are populating with children, you need do nothing but let the seeds of truth germinate along with the development of reason…. But when you resettle a nation with a past into a new country, the skill of the legislator rests in the policy of permitting the people to retain no injurious opinions and customs which can possibly be cured and corrected. If you desire to prevent these opinions and customs from becoming permanent, you will secure the second generation by a general system of public education for the children. A prince or a legislator should never establish a colony without first arranging to send wise men along to instruct the youth….” In a new colony, there is a lot of opportunity for a careful legislator who wants to purify the customs and ways if his citizens. If he has virtue and genius, the land and the people at his disposal will inspire his soul with a plan for society. Authors can only speculate what that plan will be because it’s just as unstable as any hypotheses; it’s impossible to foresee every complication, circumstance, or problem that could occur. Legislators Told How to Manage Men Rayne’s instructions to the legislators on how to manage people is similar to a professor of agriculture lecturing his students: “The climate is the first rule for the farmer. His resources determine his procedure.

He must first consider location.

If his soil is clay, he must do one thing and if the soil is sand does something else. Every facility is open to the farmer who wishes to clear and improve his soil. If he is good enough, the manure at his disposal will suggest to him a plan of operation. A professor can only speculate what that plan will be because it’s just as instable as any hypotheses; it’s impossible to foresee every complication, circumstance, or problem that could occur.” Oh, sublime writers! You should try to, at least occasionally; remember that this clay, sand, and manure you randomly dispose of are men! They are equals! They are your equals! They are rational, free human beings such as you! In the same way you have, they also received from God the faculties of observation, planning ahead, thinking, and judging for them! A Temporary Dictatorship This is what madly has to say on the subject of the law and legislator. Prior to the following quote, madly has supposed that laws, due to a lack of security, are worn out. He continues with this: “Under these circumstances, it is obvious that the springs of government are slack. Give them a new tension, and the evil will be cured…. Think less of punishing faults, and more of rewarding that which you need. In this manner you will restore to your republic the vigour of youth. Because free people have been ignorant of this procedure, they have lost their liberty! But if the evil has made such headway those ordinary governmental procedures are unable to cure it, and then resort to an extraordinary tribunal with considerable powers for a short time. The imagination of the citizens needs to be struck a hard blow.” This goes on for twenty volumes. Under the influence of teaching like this — which stems from classical education — a time came when everyone wanted to be above the rest of man in order to arrange, organize, and regulate it in his own way. Socialists Want Equality of Wealth Now let’s see what Cadillac has to say: “My Lord, assume the character of Lycurgus or of Salon. And before you finish reading this essay, amuse yourself by giving laws to some savages in America or Africa. Confine these nomads to fixed dwellings; teach them to tend flocks…. Attempt to develop the social consciousness that nature has planted in them…. Force them to begin to practice the duties of humanity…. Use punishment to cause sensual pleasures to become distasteful to them. Then you will see that every point of your legislation will cause these savages to lose a vice and gain a virtue. All people have had laws. But few people have been happy. Why is this so? Because the legislators themselves have almost always been ignorant of the purpose of society, which is the uniting of families by a common interest. Impartiality in law consists of two things: the establishing of equality in wealth and equality in dignity among the citizens…. As the laws establish greater equality, they become proportionately more precious to every citizen…. When all men are equal in wealth and dignity — and when the laws leave no hope of disturbing this equality — how can men then be agitated by greed, ambition, dissipation, idleness, sloth, envy, hatred, or jealousy? What you have learned about the republic of Sparta should enlighten you on this question. No other state has ever had laws more in accord with the order of nature; of equality.” The Error of the Socialist Writers It really isn’t that surprising that during the seventeenth and eighteenth century, man was considered inert matter; ready to receive everything — form, face, energy, movement, life — from either a great prince, legislator, or genius. These centuries were nourished on the study of antiquity. And antiquity displays everywhere — in Egypt, Persia, Greece, Rome — the spectacle of a few men melding the rest of society according to their wills, thanks to the prestige of force and fraud. But that doesn’t prove that that is what is ideal. It only shows that man and society are capable of improvement. It should naturally be expected that error, ignorance, despotism, slavery, and superstition be more prevalent nearer the start of history. The authors I quoted weren’t wrong when they found ancient institutions to be that way, but they were wrong in stating that they should be a model for future generations. Uncritical and childish conformists, they took for granted the grandeur, dignity, morality, and happiness of the artificial societies of the ancient world. They didn’t grasp that knowledge appears and grows throughout time; and that proportionately, might takes the side of right, and society reclaims possession of itself. What Is Liberty? So what political struggle are we looking at? It is the natural drive of man for liberty. And what is this liberty that shakes the world and makes the heart beat faster? Isn’t it the union of all liberties — conscience, education, association, the press, travel, labour, and trade? Basically, isn’t liberty the freedom of everyone to fully use their abilities so long as they don’t harm someone else? Isn’t liberty the destruction of all despotism — including legal despotism? Finally, isn’t liberty the limiting of government to its only rational task of allowing people the right to legal self-defence; of punishing injustice? It has to be confessed that the drive of man towards liberty is thwarted a lot of the time, especially in France. This is due to a major mistake — learned from antiquated teachings — which our writers have in common: They desire to exalt themselves over society so that they can arrange, organize, and regulate man according to their whim.

Philanthropic Tyranny While society is striving for liberty.

these famous men who put themselves in charge are filled with the spirit of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. They only think about subjecting everyone to their tyrannical philanthropy as a result of their social creations. Like Rousseau, they want to force men to casually bear the burden of the public welfare that they pulled out of thin air. This was especially true in 1789. No sooner was the old regime destroyed than society was subjected to still other artificial arrangements, always starting from the same point: the omnipotence of the law. Listen to just a few of these writers and politicians of the era: SAINT-JUST: “The legislator commands the future. It is for him to will the good of mankind. It is for him to make men what he wills them to be.” ROBESPIERRE: “The function of government is to direct the physical and moral powers of the nation toward the end for which the commonwealth has come into being.” BILLAUD-VARENNES: “A people who are to be returned to liberty must be formed anew. A strong force and vigorous action are necessary to destroy old prejudices, to change old customs, to correct depraved affections, to restrict superfluous wants, and to destroy ingrained vices…. Citizens, the inflexible austerity of Lycurgus created the firm foundation of the Spartan republic. The weak and trusting character of Salon plunged Athens into slavery. This parallel embraces the whole science of government.” LE PELLETIER: “Considering the extent of human degradation, I am convinced that it is necessary to effect a total regeneration and, if I may so express myself, of creating a new people.” The Socialists Want Dictatorship Again, it’s professed that people are nothing but raw material. It’s not their responsibility to desire their own improvement; they couldn’t possibly do so. According to Saint-Just, only the legislator can do that. People can only be what their legislator wants them to be. According to Robespierre, who literally copies Rousseau, the legislator says why the commonwealth was created. Once that is decided, the legislator only has to tell everyone and everything what to do to accomplish that purpose. And in the meantime people are supposed to be completely passive. And according to Billaud-Varennes, the people shouldn’t have any prejudices, affections or desires unless the legislator tells them to. He even says that the inflexible austerity of one man is the foundation of a republic. And in the event where the supposed evil is too great for even governmental procedures to remedy, madly suggests that there should be a dictatorship to promote virtue: “Resort,” he says, “to an extraordinary tribunal with considerable powers for a short time. The imagination of the citizens needs to be struck a hard blow.” This doctrine has not been forgotten. Listen to Robespierre: “The principle of the republican government is virtue, and the means required to establish virtue is terror. In our country we desire to substitute morality for selfishness, honesty for honour, principles for customs, duties for manners, the empire of reason for the tyranny of fashion, contempt of vice for contempt of poverty, pride for insolence, greatness of soul for vanity, love of glory for love of money, good people for good companions, merit for intrigue, genius for wit, truth for glitter, the charm of happiness for the boredom of pleasure, the greatness of man for the littleness of the great, a generous, strong, happy people for a good-natured, frivolous, degraded people; in short, we desire to substitute all the virtues and miracles of a republic for all the vices and absurdities of a monarchy.” Dictatorial Arrogance Look at how extraordinarily high Robespierre places himself above everyone! And listen to how arrogant he sounds. He isn’t satisfied with just praying for a great reawakening of the human spirit. He doesn’t even think a well ordered government could accomplish this. No, only he can do it and it can only be done through terror. This mass of rotten and contradictory statements is taken from a discourse by Robespierre where he tries to lay out what principles of morality should guide a revolutionary government. And notice that he isn’t just recommending a dictatorship for defending against foreign invasion or silencing opposition. No, he wants a dictatorship so he can terrorize in order to force his own view of morality on the people. He says that it would only be temporary until a new constitution is created but in reality, he only wishes to use terror to eliminate selfishness, honour, customs, manners, fashion, vanity, love of money, good companionship, intrigue, wit, sensuousness, and poverty from France. And not until he, the great Robespierre has accomplished these miracles, which is exactly what they would be if they were fulfilled, will he allow the law to rule again.